Why Not Artificial Sympathy?
نویسندگان
چکیده
“Empathy” and “Sympathy” are often confusingly used. Beside the difference in their usage, the key component could be a sort of emotional state to be shared, and the way to represent or manipulate it might be different. This could be clearer when we attempt to design it for artificial agents. This paper argues what are differences between empathy and sympathy, and how to design each of them for an artificial agent. First, the dictionary meaning of both is reviewed, and a metaphor to intuitively explain the difference is introduced. Next, we argue how artificial empathy and artificial sympathy can be designed, and a cognitive developmental robotics is introduced as a promising approach to the latter, especially from a viewpoint of learning and development. A rough design for artificial sympathy is argued, and preliminary studies needed to build the artificial sympathy are introduced. Finally, future issues are given.
منابع مشابه
The Scarecrow and the Tin Man: The Vicissitudes of Human Sympathy and Caring
Why do some victims elicit outpourings of sympathy from those who are unaffected, while others do not? The authors propose a theoretical framework for making sense of the vicissitudes of sympathy based on the interaction between two qualitatively different mental processes. One, which the authors term “sympathy,” is caring but immature and irrational. The other process, which the authors term “...
متن کاملMeasuring, Understanding, and Classifying News Media Sympathy on Twitter after Crisis Events
This paper investigates bias in coverage between Western and Arab media on Twitter after the November 2015 Beirut and Paris terror attacks. Using two Twitter datasets covering each attack, we investigate how Western and Arab media differed in coverage bias, sympathy bias, and resulting information propagation. We crowdsourced sympathy and sentiment labels for 2,390 tweets across four languages ...
متن کاملSympathy with Adam Smith and reflexions on self
AdamSmith’s account of themoral sentiments resonateswithmodern themes in evolutionary biology. His distinction between our reasons and the reasons for these reasons recalls the evolutionary biologist’s emphasis on different levels of causal explanation. In this view, the proximate goals of our psychologicalmotivations are different in kind from the ultimate reasons why we have evolved these mot...
متن کاملChapter 11 . MECHANISMS OF CULTURAL EVOLUTION
“Mohammedans are Mohammedans because they are born and reared among that sect, not because they have thought it out and can furnish sound reasons for being Mohammedans; we know why Catholics are Catholics; why Presbyterians are Presbyterians; why Baptists are Baptists; why Mormons are Mormons; why thieves are thieves; why monarchists are monarchists; why Republicans are Republicans and Democrat...
متن کاملWhy Supermajoritarianism Does Not Illuminate the Interpretive Debate between Originalists and Non-Originalists
962142. 43 In this more recent work, McGinnis and Rappaport cite Powell to instruct us on the interpretive conventions of the founding generation. Id. at 8 (citing Powell, supra note 39). And Powell at least provides McGinnis and Rappaport some useful support when he announces: "Although the Philadelphia framers did not discuss in detail how they intended their end product to be interpreted, th...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2012